Roll Call

Eagle Mountain, UT

Eagle Mountain · Topics

Eagle Mountain’s data centers

Four companies own data center land in Eagle Mountain. Meta has run its campus since 2021, QTS is finishing its first buildings, and Google and Tract hold land with signed agreements but nothing under construction. Each deal came with a tax incentive, a water commitment and a need for more electricity than the grid could promise. This page sets out what the city agreed to, what the data centers pay, and how each vote went, with a source under every figure.

Civic Roll Call is published by an Eagle Mountain resident and is not affiliated with the city, any candidate or any company named here. Votes and quotations come from the city’s approved minutes and meeting recordings; outside figures are linked to the document they come from. How this site is built.

The four campuses, and a power plant

Every project here sits in the northwest corner of the city, around the Pony Express Parkway, on land the council rezoned to its Regional Technology and Industry overlay. The companies sign their agreements through local companies set up for the purpose, so the minutes often name the company rather than the brand. Where the record ties the two together the card says so; where it does not, the card says that too.

Meta

Signs as Stadion, LLC. The council’s own minutes call it “Stadion, LLC (aka Meta)”.

Operating, expanding
Announced
May 2018, as Facebook
Online
July 2021
Built
About 2.4 million sq ft at opening; 4.5 million planned by the 2022 expansion
Next
About 567 acres to the south (Sweetwater #4), approved November 2025

Meta announced three more buildings on 14 September 2026 and puts its total Utah investment above $3 billion.

QTS

Signs as QTS Eagle Mountain I, LLC. Campus called SLC1.

Under construction
Site
About 193 acres west of Meta
Plan
Five buildings, $6 billion by the company’s figure
Due
Buildings 1 to 3 by the end of 2026
Next
A second site of 524 acres (QTS-SCL 2), rezoned March 2026

Google

The city’s 2021 agreements are with Curleybird, LLC. No document in the record says Curleybird is Google.

Land held, no plans filed
Announced
October 2021, about 300 acres
Agreements
June 2021, 320 acres next to Meta, about $600 million initial investment
Status
Delayed by power supply, per the Salt Lake Tribune in February 2026

The day after Google’s announcement, then-Mayor Tom Westmoreland welcomed “Google choosing to come to Eagle Mountain” and spoke of its water reserve and tax increment, the subjects of the Curleybird deal.

Tract

Tract, in the 2023 minutes, “build[s] fiber networks and own[s], develop[s], and operate[s] data centers.” Its incentive agreement is with UTLCO Eagle Mtn. Two, LLC; Tract’s representative thanked the agency board when it passed.

Land held
Bought
668 acres, announced January 2024
Agreement
About 672 acres, approved August 2024
Power
Rocky Mountain Power to deliver over 400 MW by 2028, per the city’s announcement

Williams gas plant

Signs as Will-Power UT, LLC. Not a data center: a power plant on Meta’s land.

Approved March 2026
Size
286 MW, “behind the meter”, meaning it supplies Meta directly and not the grid
Fuel
Natural gas, by a new 18.9-mile pipeline from Goshen

Sources: KSL, 30 May 2018; Meta, July 2021; Deseret News, 30 Sep 2022; Meta, Sep 2026; QTS; Daily Herald, 20 Apr 2026; Deseret News, 4 Oct 2021; Salt Lake Tribune via Grist, 24 Feb 2026; Eagle Mountain City, Jan 2024; pipeline notice filed with the Utah PSC; and the minutes linked under every vote.

The tax incentives

None of the data centers received a flat tax exemption. The city used a community reinvestment area, a tool Utah law gives cities to attract development. It works in four steps:

  1. The city draws a boundary around the land and records what the land was worth before anything was built.
  2. The data center pays its full property tax bill to Utah County like any owner.
  3. The tax on the new value, called the increment, goes to the city’s redevelopment agency instead of to the city, school district, county and water district.
  4. The agency pays an agreed share of that increment back to the company, for 20 years from each phase, inside an area that can last up to 40 years.

Each taxing body signs off on its own share. The school district collects the largest part of a property tax bill, so it gives up the most and negotiates hardest.

How much each company gets back

Company Buildings & land Equipment Agreed
Meta80%100%2018
Google (Curleybird)67.5%100%2021
QTS61%74%2023
Tract55%55%2024
Share of the property tax increment paid back to the company, for 20 years per phase. “Equipment” is personal property: the servers and machinery, which are taxed separately from buildings in Utah. Tract presented all four rows to the Planning Commission on 11 June 2024. Each one matches a separate document: the 2018 Meta terms reported by the Deseret News, the 2021 council minutes for Curleybird, and the agency’s 2024 packet for QTS and Tract.

Sources: Planning Commission minutes, 11 Jun 2024; Deseret News, 22 May 2018; council minutes, 16 Mar 2021; redevelopment agency packet, 20 Aug 2024.

Twenty years per phase, not forty

The 40-year figure that circulates is the outer limit of the area, not the length of any one rebate. Each phase gets 20 years from the year its value first shows up. Utah County’s own tax report for the Meta areas shows the first phase’s increment running 2021 to 2040 and the second 2023 to 2042. Later Meta phases would start their own 20 years.

Source: Utah County Auditor, 2023 Report 700 for Eagle Mountain.

What else the companies get

The Legislature has since changed the rules

H.B. 507, passed in 2026, bars cities from offering this kind of incentive to a data center of 100 megawatts or more after 6 May 2027, unless it sits in a zone the state designates. Agreements already signed continue but cannot be extended.

Source: Office of Legislative Research, data centers policy brief, Aug 2026.

What they pay

This is the question residents ask most, and the record answers only part of it.

Meta

Stadion, LLC is the largest property taxpayer on the city’s list, at $305.4 million of taxable value in fiscal 2024. In tax year 2023 the two Meta areas produced about $9.7 million of increment, all of it sent to the redevelopment agency under the agreement, which then pays most of it back to Meta at the rates in the table above. In June 2022 the city’s finance staff told the council that taxable value had “increased by almost two billion dollars”, “mostly due to the Meta development”, and that “as a result, the certified tax rate has been reduced.”

Sources: Eagle Mountain annual financial report, FY2024, principal taxpayers; 2023 Report 700; council minutes, 21 Jun 2022.

QTS: three figures that have not been reconciled

WhenWho said itTo the city, per year
Apr 2023 City staff, adopting the QTS reinvestment area about $140,000
Jul 2023 Economic development director Evan Berrett, to the council $98,000 per phase
Aug 2026 Mayor Jared Gray, reading figures QTS provided $2.7 million
The 2023 figures describe the city’s share while the rebate runs. The 2026 figure is QTS’s own estimate across five buildings, two of which, the mayor said, QTS has agreed to build with no incentive. None of the three has been tested against a tax bill, because the first QTS buildings are not yet on the rolls.

“The impact will generate over $19 million a year for our local jurisdictions… Just for Eagle Mountain City alone, in our current tax rate, that would be $2.7 million a year… QTS was granted some tax incentives when they started those first 3 buildings. They came back on these next 2… and said… we don’t want any incentives on these next builds.”

Mayor Jared Gray, truth-in-taxation hearing, 6 Aug 2026, about 3:28 into the recording. He added that these numbers “haven’t been fully realized yet.” Transcript

Sources: agency minutes, 18 Apr 2023; council minutes, 18 Jul 2023. Both sets of minutes are scanned images, so the site shows the meeting but not its text.

Why the city can’t tax data centers at a higher rate

Utah’s constitution requires property to be taxed at a uniform rate by value, so a city cannot set one rate for homes and another for data centers. The city’s staff have also told the council that the data center agreements bar any tax aimed only at them. In April 2026 a speaker the transcript does not identify told the council that “each of the data center agreements… have it in there contractually that we can’t change property tax only on that.” In June, the council discussed lowering the rate once data center revenue arrives, and a speaker warned that “if we drop taxes by ten dollars on the resident we drop by millions of dollars on the data center.” The transcript does not name that speaker either.

Sources: council transcript, 14 Apr 2026; council meeting, 16 Jun 2026. For the rate itself, see the Tax page.

Water

Early data centers cooled their servers with evaporated water. The newer ones in Eagle Mountain say they use closed loops that fill once and recirculate. The water the city has committed by contract:

CompanyAcre-feet a yearWhat the record says
Meta 625 Raised from 500 by the third amendment to its water agreement, approved unanimously on 21 Oct 2025.
Curleybird (Google) 1,000 Reserved in 2021, and lapses if construction milestones are missed. The company also holds a first refusal on 2,000 more. In 2023 staff said the city was “working with Google to not use their full water allocation.”
Tract 60 Tract’s engineer told the council in 2023 that homes on the same land would use about 1,500.
QTS — No figure in the minutes. Its representatives described the campus as “not water-cooled”. QTS publishes about 600,000 gallons to fill each building, then about 50,000 gallons a month.
One acre-foot is about 326,000 gallons: a foot of water across an acre of ground.

How much Meta draws is not public. The city agreed in 2018 to keep Meta’s monthly use confidential; the Salt Lake Tribune reported that Meta withdrew more than 35 million gallons in 2024, about 107 acre-feet. The city now treats Meta’s used cooling water and irrigates Cory Wride Park with it, after spending about $5 million on treatment and pumping. Meta says its Utah County restoration projects return 726 million gallons a year to local watersheds; nobody has audited that figure.

Sources: council minutes, 21 Oct 2025; 15 Jun 2021; 6 Jun 2023; council minutes of 2 May 2023 (scanned); QTS; Salt Lake Tribune via Grist, 21 Jan 2026; Eagle Mountain City; Meta, Sep 2026.

Power

Electricity, not land or water, is what has slowed the projects here. Both large campuses told the city that Rocky Mountain Power could not deliver what they needed when they needed it.

State law shapes how this works. S.B. 132 (2025) lets a customer expecting 100 MW or more sign a contract the Public Service Commission must find does not shift costs onto other customers, or build its own generation off the grid. Rocky Mountain Power is also building a 345-kilovolt line from Spanish Fork to its Mercer substation in Eagle Mountain, citing load growth in general. No document found for this page shows data centers raising Eagle Mountain residents’ electricity rates; the commission’s 2025 rate order points to wildfire costs.

Sources: council minutes, 4 Feb 2025; Planning Commission minutes, 14 Oct 2025; council minutes, 3 Mar 2026; legislative policy brief; PSC docket 25-035-53; Utah News Dispatch, 29 Apr 2025.

Where people stand

Both cases, as people have made them at the microphone.

The case made for them

  • “Data centers are of high value and low impact,” in the minutes’ summary of Mayor Tom Westmoreland, 5 Oct 2021.
  • Meta’s value let the certified tax rate fall: taxable value rose “by almost two billion dollars… mostly due to the Meta development,” staff told the council. 21 Jun 2022.
  • Tract’s 60 acre-feet against about 1,500 for homes on the same land, 6 Jun 2023.
  • QTS’s projected $19 million a year to local taxing bodies, most of it to the school district, read by Mayor Jared Gray, 6 Aug 2026.

The case made against them

  • Councilmember Colby Curtis asked the city “not [to] pursue additional data centers due to concerns with high water usage”; Councilmember Carolyn Love wanted a more varied business base. 15 Jun 2021.
  • Councilmember Donna Burnham voted against the Meta expansion agreement and its reinvestment area, the only no votes, in October and November 2025.
  • Residents at the 2026 budget and tax hearings asked why homeowners face a higher rate while data centers receive rebates. Joy Rasmussen asked the council to “stop approving additional data center developments”. 18 Aug 2026.
  • A resident at the Planning Commission objected that data center water use is kept confidential. 22 Sep 2026.

Two figures from the hearings, checked

At the 6 August hearing a resident said Facebook received “$150 million in property tax incentives” in 2018 and Meta another “$77 million” in 2021. The first matches the Deseret News estimate at the time for Meta’s first phase. It was a projection, not an audited sum, and later phases add to it. The second matches what the 2021 reinvestment area requested, but that area is the Curleybird deal, not Meta’s.

Sources: council transcript, 6 Aug 2026; Deseret News, 21 May 2018; Cedar Valley Sentinel, 2021.

Every vote

The main actions on data centers by the City Council, the Planning Commission and the redevelopment agency board (RDA), from the city’s minutes. The Planning Commission recommends and the council decides. Votes are given as the minutes record them.

2026 6 items
  1. CouncilAdopted a sign code for directional signs at data centers and other large projects. 5–0. Minutes
  2. PlanningRecommended the Williams gas plant, 3–1. Minutes
  3. CouncilApproved the Williams plant with four conditions, and rezoned 524 acres for QTS’s second site. Both 5–0: Clark, Huish, Whiting, Wood, Wright. Minutes
  4. CouncilExtended construction hours at QTS SLC1, 4–0, Wood excused. Minutes
  5. CouncilAt the budget hearing, residents asked the council to stop approving data centers and questioned their tax breaks. Minutes
  6. PlanningRecommended rezoning about 41 acres southwest of QTS for a possible data center, 4–0. No meeting page yet; the transcript is linked. Transcript
2025 4 items
  1. CouncilLet QTS build a 200 MW gas plant on site after its grid power fell through. 5–0. Minutes
  2. RDAOpened a survey area for Meta’s expansion, the first step toward Sweetwater #4. 3–1, Burnham against, Gray excused. Minutes
  3. CouncilApproved a new development agreement with “Stadion, LLC (aka Meta)”, 4–1, Burnham against. Raised Meta’s water from 500 to 625 acre-feet, unanimous. Minutes
  4. CouncilAdopted the Sweetwater #4 reinvestment area, about 567 acres south of Meta, 4–1, Burnham against. The agency board voted the same way that night. Minutes
2024 4 items
  1. PlanningRecommended the council deny the Tract development agreement, 3–2, after a motion to approve failed. Minutes
  2. CouncilApproved the Tract development agreement (about 672 acres) with buffering changes, and adopted the Triple Tail reinvestment area. Both unanimous: Burnham, Clark, Gray, Wood, Wright. Minutes
  3. CouncilAllowed QTS construction 24 hours a day, 7 days a week: Burnham, Clark, Wood, Wright for; Gray excused. Minutes
  4. RDAApproved the Triple Tail incentive agreement with UTLCO Eagle Mtn. Two, LLC. Unanimous. Minutes
2023 3 items
  1. RDAAdopted the Sweetwater #3 reinvestment area for QTS. Unanimous; the council adopted it the same night. Minutes
  2. CouncilRezoned about 670 acres for Tract’s TripleTail project. Unanimous. Minutes
  3. CouncilApproved the QTS development agreement and its incentive agreement: Burnham, Gray, Love, Wright for; Curtis absent. The minutes are a scanned image. Minutes
2022 4 items
  1. CouncilDebated barring more data centers and other high-water users under the technology overlay. Tabled 4–1, Burnham against. Minutes
  2. CouncilRezoned about 490 acres as the “Eagle Mountain Data Campus”, the land QTS later bought. Unanimous. Minutes
  3. CouncilStaff reported taxable value up almost $2 billion, “mostly due to the Meta development.” Minutes
  4. CouncilApproved a master infrastructure agreement with Stadion; Meta reimburses about $1.8 million for water-reuse filtration and a booster pump. Unanimous. Minutes
2021 3 items
  1. RDAAdopted the Sweetwater #2 reinvestment area, after the rebate on buildings and land was negotiated down from 75% to 67.5%. Unanimous; the council adopted it the same night. Minutes
  2. CouncilApproved the Curleybird development agreement (320 acres, about $600 million) and its water agreement reserving 1,000 acre-feet. Both unanimous: Burnham, Clark, Curtis, Love. Minutes
  3. CouncilMayor Westmoreland welcomed Google. The minutes summarize him: “Data centers are of high value and low impact.” Minutes
2020 1 item
  1. CouncilAmended Stadion’s development and water agreements: Facebook fronts $1.7 million for a sewer line in exchange for impact-fee credits. Unanimous. Minutes
2019 2 items
  1. CouncilDenied a gravel pit proposed to supply material for the Facebook site, 4–0. Minutes
  2. CouncilMoved the planned freeway southwest in the transportation plan “to open up larger parcels for data center development.” Minutes

What the record doesn’t settle

A document that settles any of these is worth sending to civicrollcall@gmail.com, as is any error on this page. Corrections are noted here, not made silently.

Page compiled 1 October 2026 from minutes through 22 September 2026.