Eagle Mountain City Council, 18 February 2020

Councílmemher Burnham moved to approve the consent øgenda, removing ítem 14.A. andplacing it ss ø scheduled ítem. Councílmemher Grøy seconded the motion. Those voting aye: Donnø Burnham, Colby Curtís, Melissø Clark, føred Gray, and Cørolyn Love. The motíon pøssed wìth a unønimous vote. SCHEDULED ITEMS 14. SITE PLANS 14.A. Silverlake South 21 8124 - Site Plan Planning Manager Michael Hadley explained Plats 21 and24 are included in the Silverlake South preliminary plat approved by the City Council on October l, 2019. This application is for a site plan for both plats. Plat 2l consists of 27 single-family lots and 32 town home units for a total of 59 units. Plat 24 consists of 39 single-family lots and 33 town home units for a total of 72 units. Items to consider include setbacks, fencing, landscaping, architectural design, and parking. The Planning Commission reviewed the site plan and recommended approval on January 28,2020. if Councilmember Gray asked the applicant had updated rear elevations, per the Planning Commission' s recommendations. Applicant Bronson Tatton said the architect is still working on the rear elevation alterations to differentiate between units. They are exploring vertical banding or changes to the roofline as possible solutions; the six-plex units already have rear pop-outs to assist with differentiation. Councilmember Curtis expressed concerns regarding approving the site plan when the renderings do not include all the elements stipulated by the City Council. Mr. Hadley said the City Council could direct staff to review and approve the elevations, or they can require the final plans to return to a future City Council meeting. Mr. Tatton stated conditions set by the City Council in the approval would help direct him, and staff can veriff the desired alterations are included in the updated renderings. Councilmember Curtis stated his preference to review the plans before approving the site plan or to approve the site plan with the renderings ftom the approved Silverlake Master Development Agreement (MDA). Mr. Tatton stated these plans are similar to what they have used in previous phases. Architectural drawings for Phases 19 and 20 were altered to comply with the City Council's stipulations. He expressed frustration that they are being asked to revise plans that have been approved and used in previous phases. Councilmember Curtis stated the Council did not notice missing architectural aspects during the approval of previous renderings; they were not in compliance with the MDA. Mr. Cook suggested the City Council give clear direction to enable Mr. Tatton to retum with renderings that meet their conditions. He cited the MDA and interpreted it to require the use of a minimum of two masonry materials on the front façade in order to remain compliant with what was fundamentally depicted in the MDA renderings. Mr. Cook stated the City Council could approve single material usage if they so desired. Mayor W'estmoreland requested Council feedback regarding the requirement for multiple materials used on front façades. Councilmember Gray said if the element is included in the IVIDA, it should be required. Councilmember Bumham said she thinks the homeowners should be able to choose the single material option, but she also feels the developer should be required to adhere to the MDA. Councilmember tove suggested the possibility of allowing board and batten, which would meet the requirement for two materials while maintaining a more unified look. Councilmember Clark said the point of the requirement of the two materials is to create variety and prevent a track housing appearance. She said if the Council wants to allow the single material usage, the MDA should be amended, as opposed to overlooking the noncompliant units. Mr. Hadley explained staff only included the elevation renderings in the Council packet that had not been previously approved by the City Council with other phases. Councilmember Burnham asked for clarification if the City Council had been given all or only some ofthe elevation design options when approving the Silverlake MDA. Councilmember Curtis said if the renderings were approved with the MDA, he would abide by the decision but does not want to approve options not previously included. Mayor'Westmoreland asked if the City Council wanted to table the site plan and have fuIr. Tatton return with new renderings or approve the site plan with conditions and staff verification of compliance. Councilmember Gray suggested discussing any other issues the Council has with the site plan before cleciding to approve or table the item, and explained he would be open to staff verification of compliance with City Council conditions. Councilmember Curtis expressed concern regarding previously constructed single-family and multifamily homes in the Silverlake subdivision that do not comply with the requirements of the MDA, and stated he wants to prevent construction of additional noncompliant units. Due to multiple issues with the project, he said he would prefer to table the item in order to see new rear elevation renderings and masonry wrapping before approval. Discussion ensued regarding approving the site plan with the inclusion of conditions for rear elevation articulation or tabling the itçm and requiring Mr. Tatton to return with compliant renderings. Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - February 18,2020 Page l3 of20 Councilmember Love asked ifthe City Counoil had a consen$us on the road width, or if that should be determined by staff. Councilmembers Curtis and Gray stated a preference for the 7O-foot width with a center turn lane. Councilmember Clark expressed the preference for the 77-foot width, due to the proximity of the elementary school to multifamily housing. Mr. Tatton said the developer would have initially preferred the 70-foot width. However, the preliminary plat was elesigned aceording to the 77-foot width requirement. At this point, they would rather build the wider road and work out a reimbursement agreement with City staff" Councilmember Clark expressed concern having the burden of enforcement fall upon stafi and preferred for the applicant to return after the road negations were finalized" Councilmember Curtis suggested conditioning the site plan approval so that no building permits would be issued until Golden Eagle Road is completed to Evans Ranch. Councilmember Clark said Golden Eagle Road needs to be completed before the new elementary school opens in the fall for the safety and convenience of the residents. Mr. Hadley verified a Municipal Code-compliant amenities list for the park has been submitted. Councilmember Love expressed concerns about the distance of public parking from the cluster lots, and the reduced number of parking stalls for the area. She asked why the parking stalls at the end of the private lanes were removed. Mr. Tatton stated willingness to add parking stalls and deepen the lanes, if necessary, and said they usually leave the areas open to serve as snow storage for plowing. Councilmember Clark asked for staff to review Municipal Code requirements to see if an amendment is needed to ensure the City requires enough parking options for cluster lots. Discussion ensued over the need for cluster lot parking and sufficient widths of private drives. Councilmember Love expressed concerns over the crushed rock pathways. Mr. Tatton said staff had already requested a change of path material, and he has agreed to use conçrete or asphalt instead. He explained that some people prefer the crushed rock for aesthetics. He said concrete and asphalt are less expensive, and he has no objections to making the change" Counoilmember Curtis expressed concern that all of the conditions will not be met. Councilmember Clark asked if a safe route to the new elementary school was included in the site plan. Mr. Tatton replied that they are exploring options and plan to remove a section of fencing to create atrail opening in the end of one the shared drivos, and he stated the need to work with staff to place the opening in alignment with the school crosswalk. Councilmember Clark said discussions with Deputy Sheriff Eric McDowell confirmed the danger of crossing the street near a roundabout and the need for a crosswalk location with adequate visibility. Mr. Tatton said once staff determines the location of the crosswalk, they will remove the corresponding section of fencing for the trail. Councilmember Clark directed stafi to make the crosswalk a priority to prevent safety issues. Councilmember Curtis asked if improvement of the park strips on Golden Eagle Road was included in the site plan" Mr. Tatton said it would be included with the road installation. Discussion ensured regarding parking strip timeframes, installation sequence, and requirements. Councilmember Love asked for clarification on the installation sequence and timeframe for sections of Golden Eagle Road to facilitate traffic flow. Mr. Tatton said they were starting on Phases 22, 23 , 25 , and 26 on February 23 , and once Phases 2 I and 24 are approved, they will be able to hnish Golden Eagle Road. He said they would prefer a sequential construction of the phases, but it is dependent upon the reimbursement agreement with the City. Discussion ensued regarding the installation sequence and approval needs for sections of Golden Eagle Road.

Councilmember Curtís moved to approve the SilverLøke South 2I ønd 24 site pløn with the following condítíons : 1. Applicønt shall pøy a løndscape cøsh escrow to the Cíty of 82,810.40 per lot/unit at pløt recording; 2. Fencíng along Golden Eagle Road shall match the collector roød fencíng øpprovedfor the Silverlake South ørea; 3. The rear elevation shøll be chønged to include more ørchitecturul articuløtíon, ønd the møterìal and color shøll be changed to be more ìn line with the current mult¡føm¡ly design støndards; 4. The fire pít shsll be moved away from øny stractures; 5. An ADA-compliant parking støll shall be íncluded; 6. No buílding permits shall be issued ìn SilverLake South Phøses 2l and 24 untìl Golden Eagle Roød ís completed to Evøns Rønch; 7. The íncluded elevations are excluded from approval; the applícønt shøll provìde updøted elevations, ønd staff shøll verífy the followíng: rear elevøtions include ørticulation, front elevøtions include multiple materiøls, and øll elevøtions include masonry that wrøps around to the sídes of the structures, as requíred in the SílverLake Master Development Agreement; ønd 8. All trails shall be huilt to requíred støndards set forth in Manicipøl Code, íncluding øsphalt materíal. Councilmember Burnhøm seconded the motíon. Discussion ensued regarding the possibility of requiring the trail to provide a safe route to the new elementary school as a condition, as it was previously included as a condition of the approval for the Silverlake South preliminary plat but was not included on the site plan under discussion. Mr. Tatton reiterated his willingness to provide a fence opening once the City determines the location of the crosswalk. Ms. Kofoed explained that because of existing bonding in place for Phase 20, a condition is not necessary. The trail should be tied to Phase 20. Councilmember Curtis expressed concerns with the timeframe for completion of Golden Eagle Road and lack of adherence to conditions included in previous approvals" Councilmember Clark suggested tabling the site plan until staff and the developer can ftnalize the reimbursement agteement. Mr. Tatton objected to conditioning the issuance of building permits to the installation of Golden Eagle Road, as he needs the permits in order to install the road. He stated he was not comfortable explaining his objections and issues with the suggested reimbursement agreement in a public meeting. SUBSTITUTE MOTION: Councilmember Burnham moved to table the SilverLake South 21 and 24 síte plan untíl thefollowing conditíons are met: 1. A reimbursement agreement between City staff ønd the developer is in pluce; 2. A søfe route to the elementary school is determíned; 3. The applìcønt submíts updøted elevøtion renderings that include ørchìtectaral ørticulation to reør elevøtíons, maltiple masonry materials, ønd møsonry wraparound depths that meet the standards set ìn the SilverLake Møster Development Agreement; and 4. The øpplícønt submíts updated plans wìth øpproved trøíl materíøls. Councìlmember Curtis seconded the motíon. Those voting aye: Donnø Burnham, Colby Curtís, Melissa Clørk, Jøred Grøy, and Cørolyn Love. 15" ORDINANCES 15.4. ORDINANCE -- An Ordinance of Eagle Mountain City, Utah, Amending Eagle Mountain Municipal Code Chapter 15.50 Stonn Drains" Mr. Trusty explained the purpose of the ordinance is to come into compliance with reoent changes to Utah State Code as it relates to our municipal storm drain system. The amendment changes the requirement of retention from a 90th to an 80th percentile storm event, adds an appeal process for operator violation notifications, and allows for future alterations of the Best Management Practices, used to infiltrate, evapotranspire, harvest, and reuse storm water, in the Low Impact Design approach.

Councilmember Clørk moved to øpprove an ordinance of Eagle Mountain Cíty, Utah, amending the Eøgle Mountain Munícipøl Code Chupter 15.50 Storm Drøíns. Councilmember Love seconded the motion. Those votíng øye: Donna Burnhøm, Colby Curtís, Melßsa Clark, Jared Grøy, and Cørolyn Love. The motíon passed with a unanímous vote. 15.8. ORDINANCE - An Ordinance of Eagle Mountain City, Utah, Amending the Ëagle Mountain Municipal Code Chapter 17.80 Sign Regulations and Sign Pcrmits. Mayor Westmoreland asked if the City Council wanted to table the item and seek input from the Eagle Mountain Chamber of Commerce, as suggested during the work session. Councilmember Burnham suggested approving the item with a condition to remove the disputed section of the amendment. Discussion ensued regarding the amendment. Councilmember Clark stated that Section B of Chapter 17.80 required further thought and examination and that the Council should possibly encourage more strict enforcement of Municipal Code. Councilmember Love clarified that Section B should say "on-premise and right-of-way special event signs" and suggested removing "right-oÊway" from the amendment. Discussion ensued regarding the sections and verbiage to include in the amendment. Councilmember Curtis suggested discussing the need for right-oÊway signs with the Chamber of Commerce. Mr. Cook suggested alterations to address the on-premise and right-of-way issues. Councilmember Burnham verified the wording would allow businesses that are not located along a main road to place signs in a right-of-way îear their businesses. Mr" Cook explained his edits have one category for on-premise special event signs, whioh allows for one sixty-day permit and up to four twelve-day permits per year that can be approved for a right-of-way location, adjacent to the business location. A separate category for right-of-way special event signs is limited to community activities such as fundraising events, farmers markets, concerts, and school activities, with a limited size to prevent visibility obstruction. Councilmember Clark asked for the final verbiage to be included in Granicus to assist the City Council. Ms. Kofoed said the item will be codified and can be included in Granicus as well for more immediate access. The City Council reviewed and discussed Mr. Cook's suggested amendments to Sign Regulations and Sign Permits. Councilmember Love requested section A(l) of Chapter 17.80.090 be amended to allow one permit per calendar year, section A(2) be changed to limit all four signs to a total combined size of 32 square feet, and A(2)b be changed to allow signs to be posted for up to twelve consecutive days. The Council confirmed that the Planning Director or designee may approve righrof-way signage but is not required to approve this signage. Ms. Kofoed stated that City Code Enforcement staff has and will romove noncompliant signs posing ahazard to the public. Councilmember Burnham verified that time-stamped photographs may be used as evidence of violations for the issuance of fines by Code Enforcement Offîcers. Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - February 18,2020 PagelT of2O

Councílmember Love moved to approve øn ordínønce of Eagle Mountøìn CW, Utøh, amending the Eøgle Mountøín Municipal Code Chapter 17.80 Sígn Regaløtions ønd Sign Permíts with thefollowìng chønges: 1. Chapter 17"80.090 Section A(1) ís chønged to øllow one permít per cølendør yeør; 2. Chapter 17"80.090 Section A(2) ís changed to límìt øll four sígns to ø totøl combined size of 32 square feet; and 3. Chapter 17.80.090 Section A(2)b ís changed to allow signs to be posted for up to twelve consecutive days. Councilmember Burnham seconded the motion. Those votíng øye: Donna Burnham, Colby Curtís, Melissa Clørk, Jared Grøy, ønd Carolyn Love. 16. J&JRANCHES 16.4" RESOLUTION: A Resolution of Eagle Mountain City, Utåh, Approving the Fourth Amendment to the Pole Canyon Annexation and Master Development Agreement. 16.8. J & J Ranches - Preliminary Plat Mr. Hadley stated J &, J Ranches preliminary plat creates two lots on thirteen acres in the Pole Canyon area. On February 4,2020, the City Council tabled this item due to concerns regarding this plat increasing the potential for density transfers in the Pole Canyon developmont, as well as the requirement from paragraph 6.1 of the Pole Canyon MDA, which states: "Each Neighborhood Planning Area (NPA) shall be required to submit and obtain approval of a master development plan for the relevant area before development approval in the NPA is granted in any form by the City." This item also includes a minor amendment to the Pole Canyon MDA, allowing the approval of this two-lot preliminary plat without requiring the NPA-4 master development plan. Mr. Hadley presented options for the Council's consideration" Option one is to approve the fourth amendment to the Pole Canyon MDA, revising section E to remove the reference to reducing units and remove paragraph two, and approve the J & J Ranches preliminary plat. Option two is to not approve the MDA amendment and table the preliminary plat until the master development plan is submitted and approved for NPA-4 Councilmember Curtis asked if, per State Code, the preliminary plat required reapproval from the Planning Commission due to the amendment to the MDA. Mr. Cook explained that contractual requirements, such as this MDA stipulation to provide individual master development plans for each NPA, do not require Planning Commission approval.

Councilmember Clsrk moved to epprove the ømendment removíng the end of recìtal E which states, "in exchangefor PCIG øgreeing to reduce the allowed un¡ts ¡n NPA-4" øndparagraph two, ønd øpprove J & J Rønches preliminary plat. Councílmember Gray seconded the motíon. Those votíng aye: Donnø Burnham, Colby Curtis, Melíssø Clark, Jared Grøy, ønd Cørolyn Love. The motion pøssed with a unanimous vote. Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - February 18,2020 Page l8 of20 T7, CITYCOUNCII,IN4AYOR'SBUSINESS Councilmember Gray See City Council Board Liaison Report. Councilmember Clark See City Council Board Liaison Report. Councilmember Love See City Council Board Liaison Report. Councilmember Burnham See City Council Board Liaison Report. Councilmember Curtis Councilmember Curtig suggested extending permits for finishing basements for longer than six months to allow sufficient time for citizens completing some or all of the work themselves and including the cost of the basement permit with the builder fees at the time of the initial building permit issuance. Mayor Westmoreland None. 18. CITY COLINCII, BOARD LIAISON REPORTS Councilmember Gral¡ Councilmember Gray the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and Senior Citizen Advisory Council have both accomplished a lot; he is enjoying working with both groups. Councilmember Clark Councilmember Clark said she is excited for the Pony Express Rodeo Queen event on March 28, and the Eagle Mountain Art Alliance is working with the Senior Citizens Advisory Council for the second annual quilt show on April 24 and25. Councilmember Love Councilmember Love said the Planning Commission and Youth Council are doing well Councilmember Burnham Councilmember Burnham said she attended the Mountainland Association of Govemment and City projects are approximately in the middle of the list of approved projects, with the top projects receiving funding. The Military and Veterans Advisory Board will meet Thursday, February 20, at7:00 p.m., and the tibrary Board meets again in March. Councilmember Curtis Councilmember Curtis said he missed the Economic Development Board meeting due to a conflicting obligation and the Eagle Mountain Arts Alliance rescheduled their meeting. T9, COMMTJNICATION TTEMS 19.4. Financial Report 19.8. Upcoming Agenda Items z0 ADJOURNMENT

Councilmember Curtis moved to ødjourn the meetíng øt 9:04 p.m. Councilmember Love seconded the motíon. Those votíng aye: Donnø Burnham, Colby Curtís, Melissa Clark, Jøred Grøy, and Carolyn Love. The motion pøssed with ø unanimous vote.