Eagle Mountain City Council, 15 January 2019

Councilmember Gricius moved to øppoint Steve Conger to the Cemetery Boørd for ø three-yeør term ending December 31, 2021. Councilmember Curtís seconded the motion. Those votíng aye: Donna Burnham, Melíssa Clark, Colby Curtis, Stephønie Grícíus ønd Benjamín Reøves. The motion passed wíth a unønímoas vote. City Recorder Fionnuala Kofoed administered the oath of office to Mr. Conger CONSENT AGENDA 10. FY 2018 AUDIT - Acceptance of the FY 2018 Financial Audit 1. I BOND RELEASES A. Sage Park Phase A, Plat 1 & Sewer Off-sites - Into V/arranty B. Evans Ranch K-3 - Into Warranty C. Silverlake 8 - Out of Warranty D. The Village at Porter's Crossing Plats I 8.2 - Out of Warranty t2 BID AV/ARDS A. Steeplechase Lift Station Project - FX Construction l3 MINUTES A. December 4,2018 - Regular City Council Meeting

Couneilmember Burnhøm moved to øpprove the Consent Agendu, removíng items 144, 148, ønd 15A for dìscussion. Councilmemher Reøves seconded the motion. Those votíng aye: Donna Burnhøm, Melissø Clørk, Colby Curtís, Stephanie Grícius, ønd Benjømin Reaves. The motíon pøssed wíth ø unanìmous vote. SCHEDULED ITEMS 14. PRELIMINARY PLAT & SITE PLAN A. Scenic Mountain Preliminary Plat & Site Plan This item was discussed øfter Item 20. Councilmember Curtis stated much discussion took place during the previous approval process for Scenic Mountain arrd, at that time, the Council was concerned that if UDOT purchased less land than originally planned for, the density would increase in the project. Dylan Young with Fieldstone Homes stated when the master development agreement was approved in 2016, Fieldstone Homes vr'as unsure of the amount of land UDOT would be purchasing. He explained they added verbiage to the master development agreement to ensure it addressed situations such the one being discussed. Councilmember Curtis stated the business deal Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page l0 of21 between UDOT ancl Fieldstone was a private transaction and should not be used to adjust the plan with the City. Mr. Young said during the Planning Commission meeting when this item was being discussed, one of the Commissioners stated that he did not want to address the master development agreement. Mr. Young felt the Commission needed to take the agreement into account, as it is an approved planning document. He saicl the master development agreement allows for the movement of units in planning areas, and they are not requesting anything not permitted in the agreement. Councilmember Curtis said the Council's intent was for the agreement to ensure the movement of units stays within the same uses. Mr. Cook stated there are two separate issues in the master development agreement under discussion. His opinion is that the agreement allows for slight modifications of uses within each planning area. He believes that part of the agreement was included to accommodate flexibility of unit types within each planning area. The second section of the agreement addressing UDOT's land purchase states if more land is purchased than originally planned for, the density in that area would be decreased proportionally " Mr. Young disagreed with Mr. Cook's interpretation and said the agreement allows for overall density up to 10.15 dwelling units per acre throughout the project. He believes they are permitted to move units between planning areas, as long as the overall density does not exceed 10.15 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Cook said his opinion is modifications are allowed within planning areas, as long as the uses are similar. The intent was to allow the developer flexibility, as it was not known what product types were going to be built in each planning area. if Councilmeinber Clark stated flexibility does not have to fall to the City or its residents. She said flexibility is needed due to UDOT's purchase, Fieldstone should adjust their plans. Mr. Young said he felt Fieldstone did adjust the plan, as they were approved for 86 single-family units, but only have 80 units. He stated the current request does not give Fieldstone additional units in the overall plan. Councilmember Curtis stated density transfer is not something he is comfortable approving. Councilmember Clark said the plan can be tabled, delaying the project, or the Council can approve the plan with 35 units and let the developer begin building houses. Mr. Young said the plan is not feasible with only 35 units and requested the Council table the plan instead of approving it with fewer units. He reiterated his belief that the master development agreement was specifically worded to address this situation and allows for his request. Councilmember Reaves stated the developer rnade money on the transaction with UDOT and is now asking for more concessions from the City" Mr. Young stated Fieldstone is only requesting to be evaluated based on the master development agreement and the City's Municipal Code. Councilmember Clark asked Mr. Cook to clarify the two separate issues in the master development agreement regarding unit transfers. Mr. Cook explained the agteement states if a portion of the townhome parcel is taken by UDOT, the vested number of resideniial units fbr the townhome parcel will be reduced in the same proportion as the acreage of the townhome parcel taken. The other section under discussion states the developer may modify the planning areas to accommodate a relatively similar use and mix; this could rnean modifying within the planning areas, or Eagle Mountain City Cowrcil Meeting - January 15, 2019 Page l1 of21 modifying between planning areas. Mr. Cook said his interpretation is that it allows for modification within planning âreas. Mr. Young reiterated his understanding that the sections of the agreement under discussion are not separate issues; they both specifically relate to UDOT's land purchase. Councilmember Clark stated townhomes and single-family homes are not relatively similar uses. Councilmember Bumham asked if staff considered the uses similar. Planner Tayler Jensen explained cluster homes are like townhomes but they have separate walls. He said cluster homes are typically considered Tier 3, and stated the uses are similar. Mayor lTestmorelønd was excused at 9:03 p.m. Mayor Pro Tempore Grícius conducted the m.eeting in Mayor Westmoreland's absence. Mr. Young explained Fieldstone Homes was concerned the master development plan and master development agreement dictated details that were not confirmed, so they included language allowing the changes in the item under discussion. He said the developer's belief is cluster homes and townhomes are similar uses, and they are not asking for an overall increase in density" Mr" Cook stated he has not been able to fully discuss the concerns with stafior the applicant, and if the Council tables the item, he can work with them to clarify interpretations.

Councílmember Burnhum moved to tøble the Sceníc Mountaín Preliminøry Pløt & Síte Plan to the nert scheduled Cìty Council meetíng. Councilmember Cufüs seconded the motion. Those voting aye: Donnø Burnham, Melíssø CIørk, Colby Curtìs, Stephanìe Gricius, ønd Benjamin Reøves. The motìon pøssed wíth a unønimous vote. B. Arctic Circle Site Plan Planning Manager Michael Hadley showed the location and elevations of the building, and said the plan meets landscaping requirements and complies with the dark sky ordinance. He explained the applicant is aware the project will need to go thrcrugh the final plat process, and said the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval. Councilmember Clark said the Council is supportive of the business, but wants to ensure the original landowner who still owns property in the project knows the buffering wall needs to be completed. Mr. Cook noted all site plans require fencing or other buffering between commercial and residential areas. He stated his opinion that the business should prevent headlights from shining into nearby homes, and the best option to mitigate that concern is to complete the wall. Councilmember Clark asked how the City can require the applieant to place a wall on property that is not theirs. Mr. Cook stated hedges could be placed along the Arctic Circle property, but the best and easiest solution is to complete the wall. Applicant Joey Totorica stated it is not their place to install a wall 300 to 400 feet ftom their property. He said headlights from cars leaving the drive-through may reach the homes, but no other lights would be. I{e understands the homeowners' concerns, but the wall will be on another landowner's property. Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page 12 of2l Mr. Cook said he does not want to hold up the project, but visual buffering should be required. The problem is the result of one developer develcping the site without a rnaster site plan. Councilmember Clark expressed frustration that Pizza Hut was not required to add any buffering to shield headlights, and stated she wanted a solution for the residents. Councilmember Curtis said the responsibility of the wall falls to the developer. Mr. Hadley showed the Council the lot layout and explained the drive-through traffic headlights will shine into the church building, not homes. Mr. Joey Totorica, the applicant, said since the headlights will not be pointing into homes, the Council should not table the item, nor should unfair conditions of approval be placed upon him. Another of the applicants, Mr. Joe Totorica, expressed frustration that this project may be required to finish the wall, when the other businesses on the site were not required to do so. Councilmember Burnham explained the Council does not want to place an unfair burden on Arctic Circle. Mr. Cook said the wall will be required when the lot adjacent to existing homes is developed, but understands the Council's desire to have the wall built prior to that lot being developed. Adam Ferre expressed frustration that the wall has not been completed and that the project does not have a master site plan. Councilmember Reaves expressed his desire to find a solution that mitigates residents' concerns. Mr. Cook said the challenge is that there are now multiple property owners and it would be difficult to have the original property owner complete a master site plan at this point. He said the City does not want to delay the project, but also does not want to create a poor situation for nearby homeowners. Mr. Hadley said the landowner's argument against building the wall is that the final plan for each lot is unknown; therefore, they do not know what the final design of the wall will be. Mr. Jensen explained staff made multiple attempts to have the landowner complete a master site plan, but \ryere unsuccessful. Councilmember Curtis asked if the City can legally allow Arctic Circle to begin construction, while prohibiting future development until the wall is completed. Mr. Cook stated a wall will be required for buffering when the remaining empty lot is either developed or subdivided,. Discussion ensued regarding the retention pond location and conditions of approval for a business in2016. Mr. Cook reiterated that the wall will be completed once the romaining lot is developed. He said staff can work with the landowner to have the wall completed before development happens, as it will be required eventually. The Municipal Code's intent regarding buffering is to ensure customer traffic headlights do not shine into residential developments. Community Development Director Steve Mumford stated the traffic lights from Arctic Circle customers will not affect the nearby homes. He said it would be reasonable to include a condition stating if stafï finds that lights ftom the project are impacting homes, temporary buffrring would Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15, 2019 Page l3 of2l be required at that time. Ms. Kofoed stated that could be a condition of the business license approval. Mr. Mumford explained staff has a meeting scheduled with the landowner regarding a different topic, and they can discuss the wall at that time. He offered to bring a discussion item to a future City Council meeting that shows a simplified version of a site plan which includes the wall, sidewalks, streetlights, and any other master site plan items that staff and the landowner agroe upon. Mr. Mumford said the applicant is required to put in a five-foot sidewalk, and the applicant has paid for the streetlights; Black and McDonald will install the lights. Discussion ensued regarding streetlight placement requirements for the applicant's lot, and requirements for streetlight placement throughout the City. Councilmember Curtis directed staff to inform the landowner that the Council would like to speak with them at a late.lr meeting, and asked staff to bring the agreed-upon site plan to a future meeting.

Councilmember Burnham moved to approve the Arctic Círcle site pløn wíth the following conditíons: l" The applícant wíll improve the sidewølk, curb and gutter ølong Ira Hodges Sceníc Parkwøy, ønd wíll improve the trail on the north side of the properþ ølong Eagle Mountaín Boulevørd to the entrønce of the Cily Center c o m m ercìøl dev elop m ent ; 2. The øpplicønt wíll install ø streetlight, working wíth the Planning Dìrector to determine its loctttíon, unless the other developer agrees to place ø streetlight on the other síde; 3. If støffftnds the lìghts from thís project are impacting neíghboring homes, ø buffer will be requíred or theìr busíness lícense wíll be ímpacted; ønd 4. AJinaI plat wìll be approved and recorded to creøte the lot. Councilmember Resves seconded the molion. Those voting øye: Donna Burnhøm, Melissa Clark, Colby Curtís, Stephøníe Gricius, and Benjømin Reøves. The motíon pussed with ø unanimous vote. 15. ALTERNATIVE-FENÇING PROPOSAL A" Lake View Estates Mayor Pro Tempore Gricius stated the applicant requested that the Council remove the requirement to install a fence, due to the elevation change and distance between the homes and the projected freeway. If the Council chooses to require the fence, the applicant requests approval to install a white vinyl fence, instead of the required cedar post fence. Councilmember Burnham stated she is inclined to allow an altemate fence, but it would need to be a durable, metal reinfcrrced vinyl fence" Councilmember Curtis stated he does not want to waive the fence requirement, and he prefers Trex over vinyl, until the reinforced vinyl fence has proven to be durable" Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page 14 of2l Mr. Jensen recommended denying the waiver to the fbnce requirement, as the alternative fence proposal was to not have a fence. He saicl he can speak with the applicant and clirect him to bring back an application with a fence alternative.

Councilmember Burnham moved to deny the Løke View Estøtes øIternøtívefencíng proposal. Councilmember Curtis seconded the motion. Those votíng aye: Donnu Burnham, Melíssa Clurk, Colby Cartis, Stephuníe Gricius, and Benjamín Reøves.

Councilmember Curtís moved to ødopt øn ordinønce of Eagle Mountøìn City, Utah, ødopting the Third Amendment to the Fiscøl Yeør 2018-2019 Annuøl Budget Councílmember Clørk seconded the molion. Those votíng øye: Donnø Burnham, Melissø Clørk, Colby Curtís, Stephuníe Gricius and Benjømin Reøves. The motion pøssed wìth ø unønímous vote. PUBLIC HEARING 17. QRD-INANCE - An Ordinance of Eagle Mountain City. Utah. Amending Municipal Code Chapter 17.38 &r the Commercial Storaee Zone. Mr. Jensen stated the applicant-proposed amendment is to allow additional moving trailers to be stored in front of walls at storage facilities. The Planning Commission recommended denial with a vote of 4:1, as they believed the current limitation of six vehicles is appropriate. Mayor Westmoreland opened the public hearing at 7:43 p.m. Scott V/eber, an ownor oF Sunset Storage, stated they have proposed this amendment because his business has space for additional vehicles. He explained the amendment will only affect two businesses in the City, and businesses will not park the vehicles in such a way as to impede traffic, or in a way that will not be visually appealing. He said he wants to park the trailers in the front of the business as it is a liability to have customers pick up trailers in the back of the facility. He Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page l5 of21 noted Saratoga Springs does not have an orclinance similar to Eagle Mountain's regarding moving *¿ehicle parking limitations. 'Weber's Councilmember Clark disagreed with Mr. statement regarding businesses not parking in a way that impedes traffic or is visually unappealing, as businesses do park that way. She said the Council needs to consider how the amendment will affeot the entire City, not just Mr. Weber's property. Mayor Westmoreland closed the public hearing at 7:48 p.m. Councilmember Curtis asked if the amenclment would only apply to storage facilities, and said he has encountered moving and storage facilities with too many vehicles parked in front of the business. He expressed concern that the Council will be required to use discretion to determine how many vehicles are allowed at Mr. W'eber's facility, and again for Mr. Vy'eber's competitor in the City; this involves the Council in private business operations. Mr. Jensen clarified for the Council that the amendment would apply to moving and storage businesses, which are a conditional use in the Commercial Storage zone. Councilmember Clark asked how many parking stalls are required for this specific site, and how parking stall requirements are determined. Mr. Jensen said a parking table lists how many stalls are required, and the requirement is determined by business type. Fourteen parking stalls were included in Sunset Storage's site plan. Councilmember Clark said she is not comfortable with a discretionary number. She stated in order to approve the amendment, it needs to state a set amount of stalls with a specific formula that applies to all businesses within the Commercial Storage zone. Councilmember Reaves asked if Sunset Storage's parking lot is ever filled to capacity. Mr. Weber stated the only time parking is an issue is when they open their parking lot to the adjacent elementary school for special functions. Councilmember Curtis asked if a screening fence or wall was an option for Sunset Storage, as that 'Weber would not require an amendment to the Municipal Code. Mr. said fencing would be cost prohibitive. Councilmember Clark asked Mr. Weber if not receiving approval for additional vehicle storage would prohibit business operations, and if he could park the trailers in the back, behind the existing wall. Mr. V/eber said there is not room in the back, and if there was room, a liability issue is created when renters go behind the wall. FIe said if he does not receive approval, he will no longer rent trailers and the business and tax base will go to Saratoga Springs and American Fork" Councilmember Burnham asked for the distance between the road and the end of the trailers as they are currently parked. Mr. Weber said the parking area is 230 feet long and can fit fifteen trailers. He stated the trailers are not in designated parking stalls, but they have been using the area for parking since they began renting moving trailers. Councilmember Clark asked how the City would enforce conditions placed by the Council. Ms. Kofbed stated conditions of approval are included in business license approvals, and are regulated Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page l6 of2l through feedback from residents. Mr. Cook explained conditional use permits can be revoked if the conditions of approval are no longer being met. Councilmember Gricius asked why the Planning Commission recommended denial. Mr. Jensen stated the Planning Commission felt that six trailers stored outside of the wall was sufficient. Councilmember Curtis expressed concern that storage facilities in Eagle Mountain may look similar to a U-Haul business in West Valley. Mr. Weber stated the V/est Valley business is not a storage facility; it is a commercial location for U-Haul. Councilmember Gricius asked if a vegetation screen was an option for Sunset Storage, in order for the parking to meet current Municipal Code. Mr. Weber stated there is not room for a fence or screen, as it would be located in the area where he is currently parking trailers. Councilmember Curtis expressed concern regarding giving the Planning Commission discretion in determining the number of trailers allowed. He stated their role is to review items based on the application of Municipal Code; the Code needs to state a specific number. Councilmember Clark agreed that the amendment needs to state a specific number of trailers allowed. The Council discussed screening options and ways to determine a number of trailers allowed. They agreed that the amendment presented needed to include a process that determines a set number of trailers permitted.

Councilmember Grícíus moved to table øn ordinønce of Eagle Mountain City, Utøh, amending Munícípøl Code Chapter 17.38 for the Commercíal Storøge Zone until støff ønd the applícant create øn ømendment with an ímproved process to determíne a specíjïc number of traíIers øllowed. Couneíhnember Clørk seconded tke motíon, Those voting aye: Donnø Burnhøm, Melissø Clørk, Colby Curtís, Stephønie Grícius ønd Benjamín Reaves. The motion pøssed with a unanímous vote" PUBLIC HEARING 18. ORDINANÇE-én Ordinaqce-o.lEasle Mquntain City. Utah. Aloqnding Municipal Code Chapter 17.-1ù for Dqfirutions and Chaptcr 17.72 for Çqmmerc.ial aqd Multifamily Design Standards. A. Definitions B. Commercial and Multifamily Design Standards This item was discussed after Item I5B Mr. Jensen stated the staff-proposed amendment to Chapter 17.10 of the Munieipal Code allows a dwelling to have two kitchens and a wet bar. Wet bars are currently considered kitchens in the Municipal Code. It is staff s opinion thai. a wet bar is not a kitchen, and should not count as a kitchen. This amendment also adds a definition fbr Wet Bar. At the Fire Marshal's request, staff is proposing an amendment to Chapter 17.72 to assist in emergency service response times. For emergency purposes, homes must be addressed to a man door, which causes confusion in alley-loaded units where the most direct access is through a service drive, but addresses must come from the ftont of a unit" This code will require man-doors on rear-entry units so they may be addressed by the alley address. Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page 17 of2I: Mayor Pro Tempore Gricius opened the puhlic hearing at IA:03 p.m. As there were no comments, cho nlneoìJ tho honvino

Councílmember Curtìs ,noved to adopt ün ordinance of Eilgle Mountøín Cíty, Utøh, ü.mendìng Municípal Code Chøpter 17.10 for Deftnìtions ønd Chapter 17.72 for Commerciøl and Multifømily Desígn Standurds. Councílmember Burnham seconded the motion. Those votíng øye: Donna Burnham, Melßsø Clark, Colby Curtis, Stephanie Grícíus ønd ßenjamin Reøves. The motíon pøssed wìth ø unanímous vote, 19. ORDINANCE - An Ordinance ailEagle Mountain City. UJah. Amending Municipal Code Chapter 1.20 for Elections. Chapter 3-2Q_rforPurchasiug a¡d Chapter 10.10 for Parking. A. Chapter 1.20 Elections B" Chapter 3.20 Purchasing C. Chapter 10.10 Parking Mr. Jerome confirmed section 2.(vii) would not prohibit parking along the straight side of a "T" intersection. He stated section B has been clarified and no longer references vehicle wheels being parallel to curbs.

Councílmember Burnham moved to adopt an ordìnance of Eagle Mountøín City, Utøh, amendíng Munícípøl Code Chapter 1.20 for Elections, Chapter 3.20 for Purchasing ønd Chapter 10.10 for Pørkíng. Councilmember Curtß seconded the motíon. Councilmember Curtis asked staff to administratively manage painting curbs red and parking signage. Councilmember Reaves asked if construction equipment language was added. Mr. Jerome said construction language was not added; however, staff will distribute the new Municipal Code to developers in the area, as construction vehicles will be required to follow the rules outlined in the parking ordinance. Those voting øye: Donna Burnhøm, Melissa CIørk, Colby Curtís, Stephøníe Gricius ønd Benjamín Reøves. The motíon passed with a unønìmous vote. 20 - Limitless Event This item was discus,sed after Item 17 Economic Development Director Aaron Sanborn stated in 2018, CBRS, LLC planned and managed the Limitless Supercar Shootout at Cory Wride Memorial Park and along Eagle Mountain Boulevard, and they would like to cnntinue holding the ovent. He explained the current agreement did not state the City will provide fire and police services, but staff would like to add that clause. Councilmember Burnham asked why indemnification was removed from the contract. Mr. Cook stated CBRS, LLC requested mutual indemnification, but in his opinion, it was better not to indemnify either party" He stated the agreement shows the City is not a partner of the event, but rather a sponsor, and said the insurance requirement will be utilized for liability coverage for the City. Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page l8 of2l Councilmember Clark asked why the City would pay for the fire and police service for this event, as some arganizatians are required to cover those costs, and if the City would absorb the cost of the manpower hours. She stated she did not want the City to commit to costs that may go up in the future. Mr. Cook explained if the City had to pay hard costs, a 10-8-2 public hearing is required. The contract does not cover out-oÊpocket expenses to the City. He recommended stating the City may provide those services, as long as the scope of the service fits within the contracts the City has with the Utah County Sheriff s Office and Unified Fire Authority. Chief Deputy Eric McDowell said the deputies at last year's event were those already assigned in the area, and Volunteers in Police Service (VIPS) personnel were utilized. He said there are costs associated with shutting down roads for an event this size, but last year's staffing was absorbed within the annual contract. Rob Shelton, the event argantzer, said last year's event went well. He said he would like indemnification included in the agreement, but understands Mr. Cook's point of view. He stated the prclceeds from the non-profit event go to the Make-A-Wish foundation.

Councìlmember Clurk moved to approve the Limitless Event agreement between CBRS, LLC ønd Eøgle Mountaín Cily. Councilmember Reaves seconded the motíon. AMENDED MOTION: Councilmember CIørk moved to approve the Límìtless Event øgreement between CBRS, LLC and Eøgle Mountain City, wìth the amendment that the City may offer løw enforcement ønd fire servíces. Councílmember Reaves seconded the motíon. Mr. Shelton asked that the contract include a time limit for notification if the City does not elect to provide law enforcement and fire services. Mr. Cook stated they could add a six-month notification requirement in the agreement. Mr. Shelton explained a clause in the agreement allows either side to terminate based on hardship, with a nine-month notice., and that clause could be utilized for notification. Mr. Cook clarified that if the Council wishes to have the City provide safety services, the agreement needs to state the City will provide law enforcement and fire services, as long as it does not create a hard cost to the City.

AMENDED Councilmember Clurk maved to øpprove the Limitless Event agreement between CBRS, LLC ønd Eagle Mountaín Cíty, wíth øn addition that the Cíty will provìde løw enforcement ønd. !îre semíces, as long as it does not creøte s hard cost to the City, ønd the Cíty will inform CBRS, LLC by December 3I tf unøble to provide søid servíces. Couneiltnember Reaves seconded the motion. Those votíng aye: Donnø Burnham, Melissø Clark, Colby Curtís, Stephønie Grieius and Benjømín Reaves. The motíon pøssed wíth a unanimous vote. 21. CITY COUNCILiMAYOR'S BUSINESS Councilmember Clark Eagle Mountain City Council Meeting - January 15,2019 Page 19 of2l Councilmember Clark said she went to the Small Business Meet-up hosted by Six Sisters Deli and Grille, Eagle lV[ountain City, and the Eagle Mountain Chamber of Commerce, and was pleased with the turnout; there were 25 to 35 business owners in attendance. CouncilmeutbetCurtis Councilmember Curtis asked Ms. Kofoed to supply contact information to the Council for the new liaison assignments. Councilmember Burnham No commont" Councilmember Reaves No comment. Mayor Pro Tempore Gricius No comment. 22" CITY COUNCIL BOARD LIAISON REPORTS [,iaison Assignments Councilmember Burnham - Planning Commission, Pony Express Events, and Chamber of Commerce Councilmember Gricius - Planning Commission, Utah League of Cities and Towns, Utah County Sheriff s Office, and Unified Fire Authority Councilmember Curtis - Senior Citizens Advisory Council and Mountainland Association of Governments Councilmember Clark - Youth Council, Military and Veterans Advisory Board, Eagle Mountain Arts Alliance, and Emergency Preparedness Councilmember Reaves - Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Cemetery Advisory Board, and Library Board Ms. Kofoe<l stated she can get eontact info to Councilmernbers, as needed. 23. COMMI-INICATION I]'EMS A. Upcoming Agenda ltems B. Financial Report 24. ADJOURNMENT